Pre-Charge Sex Crime Lawyer Maryland

The stretch between an allegation and a charging decision is short in some Maryland matters and long in others, and it is the only stretch in which the accused still holds meaningful influence over the record. Once a charging document exists, the file is largely set. The statements are made. The devices are imaged. The messages are either gone or preserved. Counsel who arrives afterward inherits whatever those earlier weeks produced.

Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., founded in 1997, represents people in Maryland who face an allegation of a sexual offense that has not yet produced a charge. Charging decisions in this area turn on statutes including Md. Code, Crim. Law § 3-303 and § 3-304 for rape in the first and second degree, § 3-307 and § 3-308 for sexual offense in the third and fourth degree, § 3-602 for sexual abuse of a minor, and § 3-324 for sexual solicitation of a minor. The distinctions among them are not academic. Sexual offense in the fourth degree under § 3-308 is a misdemeanor carrying up to 1 year or a $1,000 fine, while sexual abuse of a minor under § 3-602 is a felony carrying up to 25 years.

No one can promise how a charging decision will turn out. Counsel can work on what precedes it: the conduct of the person under investigation, the records that survive the waiting period, and the material a prosecutor eventually reviews. Request a consultation through the firm’s 24/7 phone intake at (888) 437-7747.

On this page

Why Conduct Before a Charge Shapes What Remains Possible After

A small set of decisions accounts for most of the avoidable damage that shows up in Maryland files by the time counsel is retained.

Giving a statement without counsel. An investigator’s request rarely arrives as a confrontation. It arrives as an invitation to clear something up. The person under investigation, believing that candor will end the matter, sits for a recorded interview and answers questions whose purpose is not apparent from the outside. Answers given without knowing what investigators already hold can conflict with a forgotten text message, a timestamp on a photograph, or the account another witness gave. Those conflicts survive into the charging file and outlast any explanation offered later.

Deleting rather than preserving. The reflex to clear a phone is strong, and it is the wrong reflex. Deletion seldom removes material from an extraction report, because items persist in unallocated space and in cloud backups, and the deletion itself becomes a fact in the file. Material that would help the accused disappears in the same sweep: the thread showing a friendly exchange after the alleged date, the photograph placing a phone somewhere else, the calendar entry, the ride-share receipt. Counsel instructs clients to preserve everything and to document what exists before routine deletion cycles remove it.

Contacting the complainant. Reaching out to explain, to apologize, or to ask a mutual friend to intercede converts a disputed allegation into a documented sequence of contacts. Where investigators are monitoring, the exchange is recorded. Where a court order limits contact, reaching out risks creating a separate matter on top of the allegation. The firm directs clients to stop all contact, direct and indirect, including contact through relatives and through social media accounts.

Engaging with the prosecutor. Counsel can sometimes present information to a prosecutor before a charging decision is made: records that contradict a timeline, context for a statement taken in isolation, or the identity of witnesses the investigation did not reach. Whether that engagement is advisable depends on the file, and it carries no assurance about the decision that follows. It is work that can be done, not a result that follows from doing it.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle These Cases

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys open a pre-charge matter by establishing what the client must stop doing and what the client must keep.

The first conversation covers conduct. Counsel gives instructions on contact, on devices, on social media, and on conversations with relatives, employers, and friends, because a client’s account repeated casually to a third party can reach investigators in altered form.

The firm builds a preservation record. Counsel identifies the accounts, devices, and third-party records that bear on the allegation and takes steps to capture them while they exist. Messaging platforms purge content on their own schedules, security footage overwrites itself, and employment and building-access records get archived. A record preserved in the pre-charge window remains available later. A record lost in that window is generally gone.

The firm positions the client relative to the statutes. Counsel analyzes which provision the alleged conduct would implicate and what turns on the distinction, because the gap between § 3-307, a felony carrying up to 10 years, and § 3-308, a misdemeanor carrying up to 1 year or a $1,000 fine, is a difference in kind. Where a minor is involved, § 3-602 and § 3-324 carry their own exposure, and § 3-324 reaches solicitation made in person, by agent, telephone, print, mail, computer or Internet, with jurisdiction in Maryland where the solicitation originated in or was received in the State.

The firm decides whether and how to engage. Counsel weighs whether presenting material to the prosecutor before a charging decision serves the client, what the firm would have to disclose to do it, and what the client gives up by disclosing it. That decision belongs to the client after counsel explains the trade-offs, and no outcome follows from the choice automatically.

The Attorneys Who Advise During the Pre-Charge Window

Mr. Sris founded the firm in 1997 and holds the title Owner and Founder. He is a former prosecutor. That background informs how the firm evaluates what an investigative file communicates to the person who decides whether to charge. He is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York.

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys work these matters together, dividing tasks by what the file requires: instructions to the client, preservation of records, communication with the investigating agency, statutory analysis, and any approach to the prosecutor. The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys contract directly with the firm. Because a pre-charge matter can turn on a decision made quickly, the firm keeps the client informed about what is pending and what remains open at each stage.

The firm practices in criminal defense and concentrates in Maryland matters involving allegations of sexual offenses, including those governed by Md. Code, Crim. Law § 3-303, § 3-304, § 3-307, § 3-308, § 3-602, and § 3-324, together with the tier I, tier II, and tier III classifications set out in Md. Code, Crim. Proc. § 11-701. Md. Code, Crim. Law §§ 3-305 and 3-306 were repealed and are not current law.

The firm maintains 24/7 phone intake. Request a consultation at (888) 437-7747.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I delete messages or photos that look bad out of context?

No. Deletion seldom removes material from a forensic extraction, because items linger in unallocated space and in cloud backups, and the act of deleting becomes a documented fact in the file. The sweep also destroys the material that helps you: the thread showing a friendly exchange after the date in question, the photograph whose metadata places your phone elsewhere, the payment receipt, the calendar entry. Preserve everything, including what feels embarrassing, and give counsel the complete picture rather than an edited one. If investigators already hold a device, tell counsel exactly what was on it rather than assuming anything is unrecoverable.

Can the firm keep charges from being filed?

No lawyer can promise that outcome. A charging decision rests with the State. What counsel can do is work on the inputs to that decision: instructing a client on conduct so the file does not grow worse, preserving records that would otherwise expire, correcting factual errors a report has carried forward, and, where the file supports it, presenting material to the prosecutor before the decision is made. That work is real and it is time-limited. It carries no guaranteed result, and the firm does not present it as one. Counsel can tell you what the work involves in your matter and what it cannot reach.

The person who made the allegation is my relative and wants to talk. Can I contact them?

Do not, and do not ask anyone else to do it on your behalf. Contact through a sibling, a parent, a mutual friend, or a social media account is still contact, and the file records it as such. Where investigators have arranged monitoring, the conversation is captured. Where a court order limits contact, reaching out risks a separate matter layered on top of the allegation. If communication genuinely needs to happen, counsel handles it through appropriate channels. The impulse to settle things directly with a family member is understandable, and acting on it ranks among the most damaging steps available.

What happens if I simply wait until a charge arrives?

The investigation continues without any input from your side of it. Records that would have supported an account expire on their ordinary schedules, witnesses become harder to locate, memories blur, and any statement you gave early stands unexamined in the file. When counsel enters after a charging document issues, the work begins with whatever the preceding weeks produced. Waiting is a choice with consequences rather than a neutral position. Entering earlier guarantees no particular outcome. It does mean the material available at the moment of decision includes something other than what investigators gathered alone.

Does hiring a lawyer before charges make me look guilty?

Investigators encounter represented people constantly, and representation is an ordinary feature of the process rather than a signal about the facts. The practical effect runs the other way. Once counsel appears, requests route through counsel, interviews get scheduled and prepared rather than sprung, and the client stops making unadvised decisions under pressure. The larger risk sits with the opposite choice, where a person tries to appear cooperative by answering questions without knowing what the investigation already contains. If concern about appearances is holding you back, raise it with counsel and treat it as part of the strategy.

This page provides general information and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.