Age of Consent New York

New York’s Penal Law does not use the phrase “age of consent,” but § 130.05(3) supplies the rule the phrase reaches for: it deems persons under seventeen incapable of consent. That rule is real and also incomplete, because the rape and sexual abuse sections draw their own age lines and most of them set a minimum age for the accused as well.

The result is a set of tiers rather than one number. A person less than eleven, or less than thirteen where the actor is eighteen or more, falls within § 130.35. A person less than fifteen falls within § 130.30 where the actor is eighteen or older. A person under seventeen falls within § 130.25 where the actor is twenty-one or older. The sexual abuse sections draw their own lines again. Both ages matter, and so does the distance between them. Request a consultation. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. was founded in 1997 and maintains 24/7 phone intake at (888) 437-7747.

On this page

Where the Age Rule Actually Comes From

Section 130.05 is the hinge. It makes lack of consent an element of every Article 130 offense, which means the prosecution must establish it in every case brought under the article, not only in cases people think of as forcible. Subdivision three then lists categories of people deemed incapable of consent. Age is one entry. The subdivision also reaches persons who are mentally disabled or mentally incapacitated, persons who are physically helpless, and persons in certain custodial or supervisory relationships.

That structure explains why New York needs no statute named after age. Once a person falls within a category in § 130.05(3), the consent element is satisfied by the category itself, and the remaining question is which section of Article 130 the alleged conduct falls under. It also explains why age is not the only route into the article. Two adults can be within its reach if one of them is physically helpless or within a custodial or supervisory relationship. And § 130.25 contains subdivisions, numbered seven through nine, that reach vaginal, oral or anal sexual contact without consent where the lack of consent arises from a factor other than incapacity, so the age route and the non-age route sit side by side inside a single section.

The Age Tiers, Section by Section

Rape in the first degree, § 130.35, is a class B felony. It includes a person less than eleven years old, and a person less than thirteen years old where the actor is eighteen or more. The first branch does not depend on the age of the accused at all.

Rape in the second degree, § 130.30, is a class D felony. Subdivisions one through three reach an actor eighteen or older who engages in vaginal, oral or anal sexual contact with a person less than fifteen, and those three subdivisions carry an affirmative defense where the defendant was less than four years older than the victim. Rape in the third degree, § 130.25, is a class E felony, and subdivisions four through six reach an actor twenty-one or older who engages in that contact with a person under seventeen.

The sexual abuse sections run alongside these. Sexual abuse in the first degree, § 130.65, is a class D felony. Sexual abuse in the second degree, § 130.60, is a class A misdemeanor reaching a victim incapable of consent for a reason other than being less than seventeen, and a victim less than fourteen. Sexual abuse in the third degree, § 130.55, is a class B misdemeanor, and it carries an affirmative defense tied to the age gap.

Why the Age of Both People Matters

In most age-based subdivisions the age of the accused is an element, not background. Subdivisions one through three of § 130.30 are written for an actor eighteen or older; subdivisions four through six of § 130.25 are written for an actor twenty-one or older. Where an accused does not meet the age a subdivision states, that subdivision’s elements are not made out, whatever else the facts show.

The distance between the two ages can matter separately. The affirmative defense in § 130.30 turns on the defendant being less than four years older than the victim, and the affirmative defense in § 130.55 turns on the defendant being less than five years older, with the other conditions that section states. Neither defense reaches every part of Article 130; each attaches to the section that contains it.

One more variable belongs in the picture. Article 130 was recently restructured by L.2023 c.777, “sexual intercourse” was deleted, and § 130.00(1) now defines “vaginal sexual contact” as contact between the penis and the vagina or vulva with no penetration element, alongside “oral sexual contact” and “anal sexual contact.” The change is recent, and the date of the alleged conduct governs which version of the statute applies to a given case.

Frequently Asked Questions

What age does New York use as its consent line?

Section 130.05(3) deems persons under seventeen incapable of consent, so seventeen is the figure most often quoted. It does not settle a case by itself. The sections of Article 130 set their own lines at eleven, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen and seventeen, and most also require the accused to be a stated age, so you have to read the section as well as the consent rule.

Does § 130.05(3) apply only to age?

No. Age is one entry on the list. The subdivision also covers persons who are mentally disabled or mentally incapacitated, persons who are physically helpless, and persons in certain custodial or supervisory relationships. An Article 130 charge can rest on any of those categories, which is why cases involving adults can turn on the same consent provision that age-based cases turn on.

Is there a single age line in New York?

There is not. The statute works in tiers. Under § 130.35 the lines are less than eleven, and less than thirteen where the actor is eighteen or more. Under § 130.30 the line is less than fifteen with an actor eighteen or older. Under § 130.25 it is under seventeen with an actor twenty-one or older. The sexual abuse sections add their own, including less than fourteen under § 130.60.

How does the age of the older person change the charge?

It changes which subdivision the prosecution can reach. Subdivisions one through three of § 130.30 require an actor eighteen or older, and subdivisions four through six of § 130.25 require an actor twenty-one or older. Because those ages are elements, a case involving the same complainant can fall under different sections, or outside a section entirely, depending on how old the accused was on the date alleged.

What is the difference between § 130.30 and § 130.25 on age?

Section 130.30 pairs a younger complainant with a lower actor age: less than fifteen, actor eighteen or older, graded a class D felony. Section 130.25 pairs an older complainant with a higher actor age: under seventeen, actor twenty-one or older, graded a class E felony. The two sections cover different combinations, and the classification differs accordingly.

What if both people are close in age?

Two possibilities arise. The actor-age elements may not be met, since § 130.30 requires an actor eighteen or older and § 130.25 requires an actor twenty-one or older. Separately, § 130.30 carries an affirmative defense to subdivisions one, two and three where the defendant was less than four years older than the victim.

Do the sexual abuse sections use the same ages?

Not throughout. Sexual abuse in the second degree, § 130.60, is a class A misdemeanor reaching a victim incapable of consent for a reason other than being less than seventeen, and separately a victim less than fourteen. Sexual abuse in the first degree, § 130.65, is a class D felony, and sexual abuse in the third degree, § 130.55, is a class B misdemeanor.

Does the term “sexual intercourse” still appear in these sections?

It does not. The restructure deleted that penetration-based term, and § 130.00(1) now defines “vaginal sexual contact” as contact between the penis and the vagina or vulva, with no penetration element, alongside “oral sexual contact” and “anal sexual contact.” Each rape degree carries parallel vaginal, oral and anal branches as a result.

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor and is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. The firm was founded in 1997. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys handle New York criminal defense matters, and in an age-based case they read the age elements of the charged subdivision against the dates in the file. The firm meets with clients by appointment at its locations and maintains 24/7 phone intake. Request a consultation with Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. at (888) 437-7747.

This page provides general information and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney Advertising. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., principal office: 4008 Williamsburg Court, Fairfax, VA 22032. By appointment. Call (888) 437-7747 to schedule.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.