Can Sex Crime Charges Be Dropped in New York

Toll-free intake · Consultations by appointment · Intake available in English and Spanish

Can Sex Crime Charges Be Dropped in New York

Sometimes a New York sex crime case ends without a conviction, but it never ends because the complaining witness decides to drop it. A criminal charge belongs to the People of the State of New York, and only a prosecutor or a court can end one.

That distinction disposes of the most common misunderstanding in these cases. A complaining witness can change an account, decline to cooperate, or ask that a case not go forward, and none of that is a decision to drop a charge, because the charge was never that person’s to drop. What such acts do to a case depends on the record. This page explains what it means for a case to end without a conviction and why sealing under New York law is not a general sequel to a resolved case. Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor, and the firm maintains 24/7 phone intake at (888) 437-7747.

Why a Complaining Witness Cannot Drop a Charge in New York

A New York criminal case is brought by the People of the State of New York. The case caption names the People, not the person who made the report. The complaining witness is a witness. That person is not the party bringing the case, does not control it, and cannot withdraw it. People often learn this late, after being told that a case will go away if the complaining witness asks.

The practical consequences follow from that structure. A prosecutor decides what to charge and whether to continue. A court decides what the law permits and what the record supports. A complaining witness who no longer wishes to participate has told a prosecutor something, and that becomes one fact among many in the file. It does not remove the charge, and it binds no one.

Statements a complaining witness has already made do not disappear when that person changes position, and a case can proceed on a record that already exists. Whether a particular case proceeds depends on that record.

Contact with a complaining witness by someone under investigation or under charge carries its own risk, and the risk does not disappear when it is indirect. Raise it with counsel before acting, not afterward.

What It Means for a Case to End Without a Conviction

A New York criminal case can end in more than one way, and not every ending is a conviction. A case may be dismissed. It may be resolved in a manner that does not produce a conviction. It may go to trial and end in an acquittal. These endings carry different consequences, and they are reached by prosecutors and courts.

Which endings are even available in a given case depends on the charges, the record, the person’s history, and circumstances specific to the matter. This page does not describe the procedures, the legal standards, the vehicles through which any outcome is sought, or any deadline. Descriptions of that kind are of little use in the abstract. Every case turns on its own record.

What can be said generally is that an ending without a conviction is not the same as an ending without a record. A criminal case that has been commenced generates records, and the existence of those records is a subject separate from the disposition. Many people assume that a case which produced no conviction leaves nothing behind, and that assumption should be tested against the actual record. Nothing here predicts that any particular case will end without a conviction.

Why Sealing Is Not a General Sequel to a New York Sex Crime Case

People often assume that a conviction which has aged can simply be sealed later. For New York sex offenses, that assumption fails at the statute.

N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 160.59 permits discretionary sealing of up to two eligible convictions, no more than one of which may be a felony, at least ten years after the sentence or the latest release. Sex offenses are excluded from it twice over. Subdivision 1(a) excludes from the definition of eligible offense any sex offense defined in Penal Law article 130, any offense defined in article 263, felony homicide offenses, violent felony offenses under Penal Law § 70.02, class A felonies, certain conspiracy offenses, felony attempts at ineligible offenses, and any offense requiring sex offender registration under Correction Law article 6-C. Subdivision 3(a) separately requires summary denial if the defendant is required to register under article 6-C.

An article 130 conviction, an article 263 conviction, and any offense requiring registration under Correction Law article 6-C can never be sealed under this section, and New York has no general expungement statute for these offenses. There is no workaround.

Relief from registration is a separate matter. N.Y. Correct. Law § 168-o addresses registration rather than records, and what it permits is narrow. Sealing and registration relief are not the same request.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the complaining witness drop the charges?

No. The charge belongs to the People of the State of New York, not to the complaining witness. That person can tell a prosecutor that he or she does not wish to proceed, and that becomes information in the file, but it is not a decision and it ends nothing. Only a prosecutor or a court can end a New York criminal case.

If the complaining witness recants, does the case end?

Not by that act alone. A change in what a witness says is a fact about the evidence, and prosecutors and courts weigh it alongside everything else already in the record. Earlier statements do not vanish. Whether a particular case continues depends on that record, and no one can answer that question without reading it. A recantation is not a mechanism for dropping a charge.

Should I contact the complaining witness to sort this out?

Raise that question with counsel before you do anything. Contact with a complaining witness by a person under investigation or under charge can create serious additional exposure, and that risk exists whether the contact is direct or indirect. This page states no rule governing such contact. The decision is not one to make on your own, and asking first is the safer sequence.

Can a lawyer get my charges dropped?

No lawyer can promise that. The decision to continue or end a prosecution rests with a prosecutor and a court and is not within any attorney’s control. Defense counsel examines the record, identifies what the evidence establishes, and presents the matter to those who decide. Anyone describing a particular result as achievable in advance is describing something that cannot be known.

If my case is dismissed, can the record be sealed?

Sealing under N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 160.59 applies to eligible convictions, and it is unavailable for any sex offense defined in Penal Law article 130, any offense defined in article 263, and any offense requiring registration under Correction Law article 6-C. It is also unavailable to an applicant required to register under article 6-C, because subdivision 3(a) requires summary denial.

Does New York expunge sex crime convictions?

No. New York has no general expungement statute for these offenses. The New York record mechanism is discretionary sealing under N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 160.59, and article 130 offenses, article 263 offenses, and any offense requiring registration under Correction Law article 6-C are excluded from it twice over. A conviction in those categories can never be sealed under that section.

Does waiting ten years help?

Not for an excluded offense. The ten-year interval in § 160.59 is a timing condition applying to convictions that qualify as eligible offenses in the first place. An article 130 or article 263 conviction, and any offense requiring registration under Correction Law article 6-C, never qualifies, so the interval never begins to matter. It does not change the exclusion in subdivision 1(a).

Is coming off the registry the same as clearing my record?

No. They are separate remedies under separate statutes. N.Y. Correct. Law § 168-o subdivision 1 permits a petition for relief from further registration only by a level two registrant without a sexual predator, sexually violent offender or predicate sex offender designation who has been registered at least thirty years, and only once every two years. None of that seals a conviction record.

Mr. Sris is the Owner and Founder of the firm and a former prosecutor, and he is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. The firm was founded in 1997 and concentrates in criminal defense. New York sex offense matters are handled by Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys, who work as a group and are assigned according to what a matter requires. On questions of the kind raised on this page, the firm answers against the statutes rather than against what a client hopes is true, including where the answer is that a remedy does not exist. Request a consultation.

Related Pages

This page provides general information and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney Advertising. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., principal office: 4008 Williamsburg Court, Fairfax, VA 22032. By appointment. Call (888) 437-7747 to schedule.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

All practice pages

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder.

Attorney advertising. This page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes and their application change and vary by case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; results may vary. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney. Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.