Car Accident Lawyer Brooklyn

When two vehicles collide on a Brooklyn street, highway ramp, or intersection, the aftermath often includes medical treatment, missed work, and uncertainty about how the resulting costs will be covered. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. represents drivers, passengers, and pedestrians who have been injured in car accidents throughout Brooklyn and Kings County. New York applies a specific comparative-fault framework to motor vehicle personal injury claims that differs from the general rule used in other types of injury cases, and understanding which rule applies, along with New York’s no-fault insurance requirements, is central to evaluating any car accident claim. The firm reviews the circumstances of each collision, works to determine which parties may be legally responsible for a client’s injuries, and evaluates whether the injuries sustained meet the threshold New York law requires before certain damages can be pursued. Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring insight from both prosecution and civil practice to the car accident claims the firm handles. If you were injured in a Brooklyn car accident, the statutory deadlines and no-fault rules that apply to your case can significantly affect your options, and discussing your situation with the firm promptly can help clarify the path forward. Call (888) 437-7747.

On this page

What Car Accidents Mean in Brooklyn

Brooklyn’s dense street grid, combined with heavy traffic on approaches to the borough’s bridges and expressways, produces a substantial volume of car accidents, and claims arising from these collisions may be litigated in Kings County Supreme Court, part of New York’s 2nd Judicial District. New York’s approach to allocating fault in a car accident case depends on the type of claim involved. For personal injury actions arising from the use or operation of a motor vehicle, which is subject to Insurance Law article 51, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(b) governs: a claimant whose own fault is found to be greater than the fault of the defendant, or the combined defendants, is barred from recovering damages entirely. This is different from the general comparative-fault rule found in N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(a), which applies outside the motor-vehicle no-fault context and simply reduces a claimant’s damages in proportion to their own share of fault without barring recovery outright. Because nearly every car accident claim involves a motor vehicle, the more restrictive rule under Insurance Law article 51 typically controls. New York’s no-fault insurance system also affects how a car accident claim proceeds. Under N.Y. Ins. Law § 5104(a), recovery for non-economic loss, such as pain and suffering, is generally unavailable between covered persons unless the claimant’s injuries meet the “serious injury” definition set out in N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102(d). That statute lists specific categories, including death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement, a fracture, permanent loss of use of a body organ or system, and permanent or significant limitation of use of a body function. A category that formerly appeared in this statute, sometimes referenced by a numeric shorthand tied to a period of restricted daily activity, was removed from the law in a 2026 revision and is no longer part of the current serious injury definition. Basic economic loss under N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102(a) is instead addressed first through no-fault first-party insurance benefits, covering, up to fifty thousand dollars per person combined, necessary medical, hospital, and rehabilitation expenses, lost earnings of up to two thousand dollars per month for not more than three years from the accident, and other reasonable and necessary expenses of up to twenty-five dollars per day for not more than one year from the accident, before a claim for additional damages proceeds through litigation.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Car Accident Cases

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys begin a Brooklyn car accident case by reviewing how the collision occurred and identifying every party who may bear legal responsibility. Under N.Y. Veh. & Traf. Law § 388, the owner of a vehicle involved in a collision can be held liable for injuries resulting from a driver’s negligence when that driver operated the vehicle with the owner’s express or implied permission, which can extend responsibility beyond the driver personally in situations involving a borrowed, company-owned, or leased vehicle. The firm applies the comparative-fault framework under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(b) to evaluate how fault may be allocated among the parties involved, recognizing that a claimant found more at fault than the defendant is barred from recovering damages under that provision. Because pain and suffering damages in a motor vehicle case require meeting the “serious injury” threshold under N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102(d), the firm reviews medical records and treatment history to assess whether a client’s injuries fall within one of the statute’s enumerated categories. The firm also considers how basic economic losses, including certain medical expenses and lost earnings, are addressed through no-fault first-party benefits before any additional claim against another driver is pursued. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys apply this combined analysis of fault, injury thresholds, and no-fault benefits to each car accident case the firm handles on behalf of injured clients throughout Brooklyn.

About Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of the firm, founded the practice in 1997 and has practiced law continuously since that time. Before founding the firm, he served as a former prosecutor, an experience that shaped his understanding of how injury and liability matters are handled within the court system. Mr. Sris attended George Mason University, where he developed a background in accounting and information systems that he has applied to complex financial and technology-related cases handled by the firm. He is admitted to practice law individually in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys work alongside Mr. Sris on the personal injury matters the firm handles, including car accident claims arising throughout Brooklyn and the surrounding area. The firm’s intake line is staffed 24/7, allowing an injured driver or passenger, or a family member acting on their behalf, to reach the office at any hour to begin discussing a potential claim. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys bring this combined background to car accident matters throughout Brooklyn and Kings County.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is New York a pure comparative negligence state for car accidents?

Not entirely, at least not for motor vehicle personal injury claims. New York generally follows a comparative-fault approach, but for personal injury actions subject to Insurance Law article 51, which includes nearly all car accident claims, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(b) provides that a claimant whose own fault is greater than the defendant’s fault is barred from recovering damages entirely. This differs from the general rule under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(a), which applies outside the motor-vehicle no-fault context and simply reduces damages in proportion to fault without barring recovery. Because this distinction affects how a claim is evaluated, understanding which rule applies to your accident matters.

What is a “serious injury” under New York’s no-fault law?

A “serious injury” is defined under N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102(d) through a list of specific categories, including death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement, a fracture, loss of a fetus, and permanent or significant limitation of use of a body organ, member, function, or system. A category that previously existed in the statute, based on a period of restricted daily activity, was removed from New York law in a 2026 revision and is no longer part of the current definition. Meeting one of the current statutory categories is generally necessary before a claimant can recover pain and suffering damages in a motor vehicle case.

What is the deadline to file a car accident injury claim in New York?

Under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(5), a personal injury claim in New York generally must be filed within three years of the date of the accident. Certain circumstances may toll or otherwise affect this period, so the exact deadline applicable to a specific case can vary. Because evidence such as witness statements and vehicle damage documentation can become harder to obtain over time, evaluating a potential claim as soon as reasonably possible after the accident is generally advisable.

How does no-fault insurance affect my ability to sue the other driver?

New York’s no-fault system generally requires that certain losses, called basic economic loss under N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102(a), be addressed first through your own insurance policy rather than through a lawsuit. A lawsuit against another driver for pain and suffering is generally limited to cases involving a “serious injury” as defined under N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102(d). This framework is intended to streamline recovery of certain losses while reserving lawsuits for more significant injuries that meet the statutory threshold described above.

Can I hold a vehicle’s owner responsible if someone else was driving?

Yes, in many cases. N.Y. Veh. & Traf. Law § 388 makes the owner of a vehicle liable for injuries caused by a driver’s negligence when that driver operated the vehicle with the owner’s express or implied permission. This can apply to a borrowed car, a company-owned vehicle, or a vehicle driven by a family member, depending on the facts. Establishing that the driver had permission to use the vehicle is an important part of pursuing a claim against the owner under this statute, in addition to any claim against the driver.

How do I start a car accident claim with the firm?

You can call the firm’s intake line, staffed 24/7, at (888) 437-7747 to request a consultation. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys review the facts of your accident, including fault, injuries, and insurance coverage, to determine how New York’s comparative-fault and no-fault statutes apply to your situation. Because statutory deadlines apply to these claims, reaching out promptly after your accident is generally advisable so that relevant evidence can be gathered while it remains available.

The same rules apply outside Brooklyn, and our page on car accident claims across New York walks through each stage.