Equitable Distribution Lawyer Manhattan

Dividing property in a Manhattan divorce is governed by New York’s equitable distribution framework, which directs New York County Supreme Court to distribute marital property fairly between spouses rather than splitting it automatically down the middle. Under DRL §236(B)(5), separate property remains with the spouse who owns it, while marital property, generally the assets and debts acquired during the marriage, is subject to equitable distribution based on the circumstances of the case. What counts as equitable can vary significantly from one marriage to the next, since the court weighs a range of factors specific to the parties involved. The Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., founded in 1997, represents Manhattan clients through the equitable distribution process, from identifying and valuing marital assets to presenting a position to the court on how those assets should be divided. Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. and a former prosecutor, applies courtroom experience to property division disputes that require presenting financial evidence to a judge. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys work with clients to identify marital and separate property, gather the financial documentation needed to support a fair distribution, and represent clients through negotiation or litigation over how property should be divided. The firm does not offer free consultations, but clients can request a scheduled consultation to discuss property division in their Manhattan divorce. To speak with the firm about equitable distribution, call (888) 437-7747.

On this page

What Equitable Distribution Means in Manhattan

New York is an equitable distribution state, meaning that under DRL §236(B)(5), marital property is divided fairly between spouses based on the circumstances of the case, rather than split automatically in half. Separate property, generally property owned before the marriage or received individually by gift or inheritance, remains with its owner and is not subject to distribution. To decide what is equitable, New York County Supreme Court considers a list of factors set out in the statute, including the income and property each spouse had at the time of the marriage and at the start of the divorce action, the duration of the marriage, the age and health of both spouses, the need of a custodial parent to occupy or own the marital residence, any loss of inheritance or pension rights caused by the divorce, the loss of health insurance benefits, any maintenance award, and each spouse’s contributions to acquiring marital property, including contributions as a homemaker or parent and contributions to the other spouse’s career or earning capacity. The court also considers the liquid or non-liquid nature of the parties’ assets, the parties’ probable future financial circumstances, how difficult certain assets or business interests are to value, the tax consequences of a proposed distribution to each party, whether either party wastefully dissipated marital assets, whether either party transferred or encumbered assets in contemplation of the divorce without fair consideration, any history of domestic violence between the parties, the best interest of a companion animal when awarding its possession, and any other factor the court finds just and proper to consider. Notably, the statute excludes a spouse’s own enhanced earning capacity, such as that derived from a professional license, degree, or celebrity status, from being treated as marital property subject to distribution, though the court can still consider the other spouse’s contributions toward developing that enhanced earning capacity when weighing the overall distribution. New York County Supreme Court must identify which of these factors it considered and explain its reasoning when issuing a decision on equitable distribution, a requirement that cannot be waived.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Equitable Distribution Cases

Equitable distribution cases often begin with identifying which assets and debts are marital property subject to distribution and which are separate property that remains with one spouse. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys work with clients to review bank and retirement accounts, real estate, business interests, and other assets acquired during the marriage, along with any property a client believes should be classified as separate. Because DRL §236(B)(5) directs the court to weigh factors such as the parties’ respective incomes and property, the duration of the marriage, and each spouse’s contributions to acquiring marital assets, the team gathers financial documentation that speaks directly to these factors, including records that establish a homemaker’s or parent’s non-financial contributions to the marriage. For clients with harder-to-value assets, such as a closely held business or investment holdings, the team considers how those assets fit within the statutory framework and works toward a position supported by the available financial evidence. Mr. Sris brings a former prosecutor’s courtroom experience to distribution disputes that require presenting financial evidence and argument to a judge in New York County Supreme Court, and his accounting and information systems background from George Mason University has been directly applied to cases involving business valuation and complex financial records. The team is also attentive to the statute’s exclusion of a spouse’s own enhanced earning capacity, such as a professional license or degree, from distribution, while still considering the other spouse’s documented contributions to that earning capacity where relevant. Throughout an equitable distribution matter, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys keep clients informed of the factors likely to be significant in their case and work toward a resolution that reflects the statutory framework, without guaranteeing a specific division. Clients can request a consultation to discuss the property at issue in their case.

About the Attorney

Mr. Sris is the Owner and Founder of the firm, which he established in 1997, and a former prosecutor. His courtroom background applies directly to equitable distribution disputes, which frequently require presenting financial evidence and argument to a judge in New York County Supreme Court. Mr. Sris is admitted to practice in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. He attended George Mason University, where he developed a background in accounting and information systems. That background has been applied to complex financial and technology-related cases, including matters involving business valuation, the tracing of separate property, and other financial questions that frequently arise in equitable distribution disputes. In addition to Mr. Sris, the firm’s family law team includes Of Counsel attorneys who contract directly with the firm and assist clients with matrimonial property matters throughout Manhattan and the wider New York City area. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys work together to review the marital and separate property at issue in a case, gather the financial documentation needed to support a client’s position, and represent clients through negotiation or litigation over how property should be divided under DRL §236(B)(5). The firm does not offer free consultations. Clients who want to discuss how equitable distribution may apply to their marital property can request a scheduled consultation to review the assets and factors relevant to their case.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is equitable distribution in a New York divorce?

Equitable distribution is the framework New York courts use to divide marital property in a divorce, based on DRL §236(B)(5). Rather than splitting property automatically in half, New York County Supreme Court divides marital property fairly, considering a list of factors specific to the marriage, while separate property remains with the spouse who owns it. Marital property generally includes assets and debts acquired during the marriage, while separate property generally includes what a spouse owned before the marriage or received individually by gift or inheritance. The specific outcome in any case depends on how the statutory factors apply to that couple’s circumstances.

What factors does the court consider when dividing property?

DRL §236(B)(5) directs the court to weigh factors including each spouse’s income and property at the time of marriage and at the start of the case, the length of the marriage, the age and health of both spouses, a custodial parent’s need to remain in the marital residence, loss of inheritance, pension, or health insurance benefits, any maintenance award, each spouse’s contributions to acquiring marital property, the liquid or non-liquid nature of assets, tax consequences, wasteful dissipation of assets, domestic violence, the best interest of a companion animal, and any other factor the court finds just and proper.

Is a professional license or degree considered marital property?

No. New York’s equitable distribution statute excludes a spouse’s own enhanced earning capacity, including that derived from a professional license, degree, or celebrity status, from being treated as marital property subject to distribution. The court can still consider the other spouse’s documented contributions toward helping develop that enhanced earning capacity, such as financial support during school or taking on a larger share of household responsibilities, when weighing the overall equitable distribution of the couple’s actual marital property. This is a nuanced area of the law, and how it applies depends on the specific facts of the marriage.

How are contributions as a homemaker or parent treated in equitable distribution?

DRL §236(B)(5) explicitly directs the court to consider each spouse’s contributions to acquiring marital property, including contributions as a homemaker or parent and contributions to the other spouse’s career or earning capacity. This means that a spouse who did not earn income directly but managed the household or supported the other spouse’s career can have that role recognized in how marital property is divided. Documenting these contributions, along with financial contributions, can be an important part of building a position in an equitable distribution case.

Does the court have to explain how it divided marital property?

Yes. New York County Supreme Court must set forth the factors it considered under DRL §236(B)(5) and its reasons for the distribution it orders, a requirement that cannot be waived. This means the court’s decision on equitable distribution should reflect a reasoned application of the statutory factors to the specific facts of the case rather than an unexplained division of assets. Understanding which factors are likely to matter most in your case can help you and your attorney prepare a position supported by the relevant evidence.

This page provides general information and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney Advertising. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., principal office: 4008 Williamsburg Court, Fairfax, VA 22032. By appointment. Call (888) 437-7747 to schedule.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.