Medical Malpractice Lawyer Manhattan

Patients in Manhattan hospitals and medical practices place considerable trust in the professionals treating them, and when that care falls below the standard the profession requires, the resulting harm can be severe and lasting. Medical malpractice claims arise when a healthcare provider’s negligence, whether a delayed diagnosis, a surgical error, a medication mistake, or another departure from accepted medical practice, causes injury to a patient. These claims are governed by rules specific to medical malpractice, including a limitations period different from most other personal injury claims and evidentiary requirements that typically call for medical expert testimony to establish that the applicable standard of care was not met.

New York law imposes a shorter filing deadline for medical malpractice claims than for many other personal injury claims, which makes prompt evaluation important once a patient suspects that substandard care caused an injury. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys review medical records, consult with appropriate medical experts, and evaluate whether a provider’s conduct departed from the accepted standard of care in cases connected to Manhattan hospitals, clinics, and medical practices. Because medical malpractice cases often involve complex medical and procedural issues, an early review of the medical record and treatment timeline can be important to preserving a patient’s rights. Anyone who believes a medical provider’s negligence caused an injury in Manhattan should discuss the details of the treatment and the resulting harm promptly, since the applicable filing deadline can pass while treatment or diagnosis is still being sorted out. To discuss a possible medical malpractice claim, call (888) 437-7747 to schedule a consultation.

On this page

What Medical Malpractice Means in Manhattan

Medical malpractice is a form of negligence that applies specifically to healthcare providers, including physicians, surgeons, nurses, and hospitals. A malpractice claim generally requires showing that the provider departed from the accepted standard of care applicable to the specific treatment at issue, and that this departure caused the patient’s injury. Because the standard of care is a technical medical question, these claims typically require testimony from a qualified medical expert to establish both the applicable standard and the departure from it.

New York applies a filing deadline to medical malpractice claims that differs from the deadline for most other personal injury claims. Under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214-a, a medical malpractice action generally must be commenced within two years and six months of the act, omission, or failure complained of. Where the patient received continuous treatment for the same condition that gave rise to the claim, the two-year, six-month period generally runs instead from the end of that continuous treatment. A separate exception applies where the claim involves a foreign object left in the patient’s body, which can extend the period during which a claim may be discovered and filed. These rules are fact-specific, and tolling or exceptions may apply depending on the circumstances, so anyone evaluating a potential claim should confirm the applicable deadline with counsel rather than assume a general rule applies without exception.

When medical negligence results in a patient’s death, the patient’s estate and the injured patient’s own malpractice claim are not the only possible legal avenues. A wrongful death claim is a separate cause of action, brought by a personal representative, and under N.Y. E.P.T.L. § 5-4.1 must generally be commenced within two years of the date of death. Damages in a New York wrongful death claim are limited to pecuniary losses under N.Y. E.P.T.L. § 5-4.3; grief, mental anguish, and loss of companionship are not recoverable in that claim, even though the underlying negligence caused significant loss to the family. Medical malpractice claims connected to Manhattan hospitals and providers are typically litigated in New York County Supreme Court.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Medical Malpractice Cases

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys begin a medical malpractice review by collecting and examining the relevant medical records, including treatment notes, diagnostic results, and any documentation of the care the patient received. This review establishes a timeline of the treatment and identifies where the care may have departed from accepted medical practice.

Because medical malpractice claims require expert testimony to establish the standard of care and the departure from it, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys work with qualified medical experts to evaluate whether the treatment at issue fell below the standard applicable to the provider’s specialty and the specific circumstances of the treatment. This evaluation shapes whether a claim can proceed and how the claim should be presented.

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys also address the applicable filing deadline early in the representation, since medical malpractice claims are subject to a shorter limitations period than many other personal injury claims and involve fact-specific rules about continuous treatment and, in limited circumstances, foreign objects. Identifying the correct deadline early helps preserve the patient’s right to pursue a claim.

Where a case involves a patient’s death, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys evaluate whether the facts support a wrongful death claim in addition to, or instead of, an injury claim, since wrongful death involves a different filing deadline, a different set of legal representatives, and a different measure of damages under New York law. Throughout a medical malpractice case connected to Manhattan providers, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys communicate with the client about the medical evidence, the expert review process, and how the case is proceeding toward resolution or trial, including litigation in New York County Supreme Court when necessary.

About Mr. Sris

Mr. Sris is the Owner and Founder of the firm and a former prosecutor who founded the firm in 1997. He is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York, which allows him to advise clients on medical malpractice and other personal injury matters connected to Manhattan and the broader New York area.

As a former prosecutor, Mr. Sris gained direct experience with how evidence, including expert testimony, is developed and presented in litigation. That experience continues to inform the firm’s approach to medical malpractice cases, which depend heavily on medical expert review to establish whether a provider’s care fell below the accepted standard.

Mr. Sris also holds a background in accounting and information systems from George Mason University, applied to complex financial and technology-related cases. This background can support work on medical malpractice claims that involve detailed billing records, electronic medical records, or other technical documentation relevant to establishing what care was provided and when.

Mr. Sris works alongside the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys, who bring additional experience to the firm’s medical malpractice and personal injury practice. Patients or families who believe a Manhattan medical provider’s negligence caused an injury or death can discuss the circumstances with the firm by calling (888) 437-7747 to schedule a consultation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What counts as medical malpractice in New York?

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider’s treatment departs from the accepted standard of care applicable to the situation, and that departure causes injury to the patient. This can include a misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis, a surgical error, a medication error, a failure to obtain informed consent, or another departure from accepted medical practice. Not every bad outcome is malpractice; a claim generally requires showing both that the provider’s conduct fell below the applicable standard and that this departure caused the injury, which typically requires supporting testimony from a qualified medical expert. Evaluating whether a specific situation involves malpractice requires a review of the medical records and treatment timeline particular to the case, which is why an early review by an attorney and appropriate medical experts is important.

How long do I have to file a medical malpractice claim in New York?

Under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214-a, a medical malpractice action generally must be commenced within two years and six months of the act, omission, or failure complained of. Where the patient received continuous treatment for the same condition, this period generally runs instead from the end of that continuous treatment. A separate, narrow exception applies to claims involving a foreign object left in the patient’s body. Because these rules involve fact-specific tolling and exceptions, and because a claim can be barred permanently once the deadline passes, anyone considering a medical malpractice claim in Manhattan should confirm the applicable deadline with an attorney as early as possible rather than relying on a general estimate.

Do I need a medical expert to bring a malpractice claim?

Yes. New York medical malpractice claims generally require expert testimony to establish both the standard of care applicable to the provider’s treatment and how the provider’s conduct departed from that standard. Without qualified expert support, a malpractice claim is typically difficult to sustain, since the standard of care is a technical medical question outside common knowledge. Identifying an appropriate expert, one qualified in the relevant medical specialty and familiar with the type of treatment at issue, is an important early step in evaluating a potential claim. An attorney reviewing the medical records can help determine what type of expert review is appropriate for the specific facts of the case.

What if medical negligence caused a family member’s death?

When medical negligence causes a patient’s death, a wrongful death claim is a separate cause of action from the malpractice claim the patient could have brought had they survived. Under N.Y. E.P.T.L. § 5-4.1, a wrongful death action must generally be commenced within two years of the date of death and is brought by the decedent’s personal representative. Damages in a New York wrongful death claim are limited to pecuniary losses under N.Y. E.P.T.L. § 5-4.3; grief, mental anguish, and loss of companionship are not recoverable, even though these losses are real to the surviving family. An attorney can help determine whether the facts support a wrongful death claim, a malpractice-related estate claim, or both.

How is medical malpractice different from a bad medical outcome?

Not every unfavorable medical outcome results from malpractice. Medicine involves inherent risks, and a poor outcome can occur even when a provider meets the accepted standard of care. Malpractice requires showing that the provider’s conduct fell below that standard and that the departure, not simply the underlying condition or an accepted risk of treatment, caused the injury. Distinguishing an accepted risk from a departure from the standard of care generally requires a detailed review of the medical records by a qualified expert familiar with the relevant specialty. This distinction is often the central issue in a medical malpractice case and is why early medical record review matters.

Manhattan claims are handled by our New York medical malpractice practice, where the whole process is set out.