Bicycle Accident Lawyer Manhattan

Cyclists in Manhattan share the road with taxis, delivery trucks, buses, and pedestrians across a street grid that includes protected bike lanes, painted lanes, and stretches with no dedicated cycling infrastructure at all. A collision between a bicycle and a motor vehicle can throw a rider from the bike and onto pavement, causing fractures, head injuries, and road rash that require extensive treatment. Not every bicycle accident involves a motor vehicle, however; some result from a pothole, a broken grate, uneven pavement, or another hazardous condition on a city-owned street, in which case the City of New York or another public entity may bear responsibility. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. represents injured cyclists in Manhattan, evaluating whether a case involves a negligent driver, a defective or dangerous street condition, or both. Because a claim against a City agency involves procedural requirements that do not apply to a claim against a private driver, identifying the correct defendant early in the process can affect the steps a claimant needs to take and the deadlines that apply. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys review the location and cause of the accident, applicable insurance coverage, and, where a public entity may be responsible, the specific notice requirements that apply to claims against a city. Building a bicycle accident case often requires photographs of the roadway or hazard, witness statements, and medical documentation connecting the injuries to the incident. To discuss a Manhattan bicycle accident, call (888) 437-7747 to schedule a consultation.

On this page

What a Bicycle Accident Claim Means in Manhattan

A bicycle accident claim in Manhattan can take different forms depending on how the collision occurred. When a cyclist is struck by a motor vehicle, the claim is generally treated as a personal injury action arising from the use or operation of a motor vehicle. In that situation, New York’s modified comparative fault rule applies. Under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(b), in a personal injury action arising from motor vehicle use or operation subject to Insurance Law article 51, a claimant whose culpable conduct is greater than that of the defendant, or of the defendants combined, is barred from recovering damages; the statute does not specify a percentage threshold.

When a bicycle accident does not involve a motor vehicle, for example a fall caused by a defective or dangerous condition on a city street such as a pothole or a broken grate, the claim is instead evaluated under New York’s general comparative fault rule. Under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(a), a claimant’s own culpable conduct does not bar recovery but proportionally reduces the damages recoverable based on the claimant’s share of fault.

Where the City of New York or another public corporation may be a defendant, for example because a dangerous roadway condition was on a city-owned street, additional procedural requirements apply before a lawsuit can be filed. Under N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 50-e, a notice of claim must be served on the public entity within ninety days after the claim arises, as a condition precedent to filing suit. Under N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 50-i, an action against a city, including New York City, for personal injury must be commenced within one year and ninety days after the event. These requirements apply specifically to claims against a municipal or public entity; they do not apply to a claim brought solely against a private driver. Regardless of who the defendant is, a personal injury action in New York is also generally subject to the three-year period under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(5), and anyone evaluating a claim should confirm which deadlines apply given the parties involved.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Bicycle Accident Cases

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys begin a bicycle accident case by determining exactly how the collision occurred and who may be responsible. Where a motor vehicle struck the cyclist, the firm gathers police reports, driver information, and available insurance coverage, and evaluates the facts under New York’s motor-vehicle-specific comparative fault rule. Where the accident instead resulted from a roadway hazard, such as a pothole, uneven pavement, or a broken grate, the firm investigates who owns and maintains that section of roadway, since responsibility may rest with the City of New York, a utility company, an adjacent property owner, or a private contractor.

When a City agency may be a defendant, the firm is attentive to the notice of claim requirement under N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 50-e and the shortened limitations period under N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 50-i, since missing these deadlines can foreclose a claim entirely. Because these procedural requirements do not apply to every bicycle accident case, and apply only when a public entity is a potential defendant, the firm evaluates at the outset whether the City or another public corporation is properly part of the claim, or whether the case involves only private parties.

The firm also documents the cyclist’s injuries, working with medical providers to connect treatment to the incident, and reviews any available photographs, video footage, or witness accounts of the roadway conditions or the collision itself. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys aim to identify every viable claim, whether against a driver, a public entity, or another responsible party, within the deadlines that apply to each. The firm does not offer free consultations and evaluates every bicycle accident case on its own facts.

About Mr. Sris

Mr. Sris is the Owner and Founder of the firm and a former prosecutor who founded the firm in 1997. Since then, the firm has represented injured clients in personal injury matters throughout New York and other jurisdictions, including cases involving cyclists injured by negligent drivers or by dangerous roadway conditions. Mr. Sris is admitted to practice in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York.

Mr. Sris’s background in accounting and information systems, developed at George Mason University, is a foundation he has applied to complex financial and technology-related cases. That background can support the review of municipal records, maintenance logs, and other documentation relevant to a bicycle accident claim involving a roadway defect.

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys represent cyclists injured in Manhattan, evaluating claims against negligent drivers, the City of New York, and other potentially responsible parties. The firm pays close attention to the procedural requirements and deadlines that apply when a public entity may be a defendant, since these differ from the deadlines applicable to claims against private individuals. The firm does not guarantee any particular outcome, and results depend on the specific facts and evidence in each case. To discuss a Manhattan bicycle accident, call (888) 437-7747 to schedule a consultation.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do I have to file a lawsuit after a Manhattan bicycle accident?

Most bicycle accident claims in New York are subject to the general personal injury statute of limitations. Under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(5), a claimant generally has three years from the date of the accident to commence a lawsuit. However, if the City of New York or another public entity may be responsible, for example because a roadway defect caused the accident, additional and shorter procedural deadlines apply, including a notice of claim requirement and a shortened limitations period. Because these municipal deadlines can be significantly shorter than three years, anyone considering a claim involving a possible City defendant should confirm the applicable deadlines with an attorney promptly after the accident.

What if my bicycle accident was caused by a pothole or damaged street?

A bicycle accident caused by a roadway defect, such as a pothole, uneven pavement, or a broken grate, may involve a claim against the City of New York or another entity responsible for maintaining that section of roadway. This type of claim is evaluated under general negligence and comparative fault principles, but it also triggers procedural requirements that apply specifically to claims against a public entity, including a notice of claim requirement. Photographs of the roadway condition, taken as soon as possible after the accident, along with information identifying the exact location, can be important to supporting this type of claim.

Is there a special notice requirement if the City of New York may be responsible?

Yes. Under N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 50-e, a notice of claim must be served on the public entity within ninety days after the claim arises, as a condition precedent to filing a lawsuit against that entity. Under N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 50-i, a lawsuit against a city, including New York City, for personal injury must then be commenced within one year and ninety days after the event. These requirements apply specifically when a City agency or other public corporation may be a defendant; they do not apply to a claim brought solely against a private driver or other private party.

Will my compensation be reduced if I was partly at fault for the crash?

Whether and how a claimant’s own conduct affects recovery depends on how the accident occurred. If a motor vehicle struck the cyclist, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(b) applies, under which a claimant whose culpable conduct is greater than the defendant’s is barred from recovering damages entirely. If the accident did not involve a motor vehicle, for example a fall caused by a roadway defect, the general rule under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(a) applies instead, under which a claimant’s fault proportionally reduces damages but does not bar recovery outright. Which rule applies depends on the specific circumstances of the accident.

Does the comparative fault rule differ for bicycle accidents involving a motor vehicle?

Yes. When a bicycle accident involves a collision with a motor vehicle subject to Insurance Law article 51, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(b) applies, and a claimant whose culpable conduct is greater than that of the defendant, or defendants combined, is barred from recovering damages, with no specific percentage stated in the statute. When a bicycle accident does not involve a motor vehicle, such as an accident caused solely by a roadway hazard, the more general rule under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(a) applies instead, under which a claimant’s own fault reduces, but does not eliminate, potential recovery.

Manhattan claims are handled by our New York bicycle accident practice, where the whole process is set out.