Child Molestation Lawyer Maryland

Maryland’s criminal code contains no offense named child molestation. Parents, school staff, and news accounts use the phrase, but a Maryland charging document names a statutory section instead. The State charges the underlying conduct under Md. Code, Crim. Law § 3-602, sexual abuse of a minor, and under the sexual offense sections that reach sexual contact and sexual acts involving a child. That gap matters from the first day, because the section the State selects controls the elements it must prove and the maximum sentence a court may impose.

People usually learn of an allegation like this indirectly. A detective calls and asks for a short conversation. An investigator appears at the door. Exposure varies widely from one section to the next. Section 3-602 reaches a parent or other person with permanent or temporary care, custody, or responsibility for supervision of a minor, along with a household or family member, and it carries imprisonment not exceeding 25 years. A sexual offense in the third degree under § 3-307 carries imprisonment not exceeding 10 years. A sexual offense in the fourth degree under § 3-308 is a misdemeanor.

Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. defends allegations of this kind in Maryland courts. The work begins by identifying which statutory theory the State intends to pursue and what the existing record actually supports. Anyone facing a Maryland investigation or charge of this type can reach the firm at (888) 437-7747.

On this page

What Maryland Charges When People Say Child Molestation

Md. Code, Crim. Law § 3-602 prohibits a parent or other person who has permanent or temporary care, custody, or responsibility for supervision of a minor, or a household or family member, from causing sexual abuse to the minor. The statute defines sexual abuse as an act involving sexual molestation or exploitation, whether or not physical injuries are sustained. The offense is a felony carrying imprisonment not exceeding 25 years. Two features drive most litigation here: the status of the accused, and the breadth of the phrase molestation or exploitation.

Where the alleged conduct involves sexual contact, a sexual act, or vaginal intercourse, the State often adds or substitutes a sexual offense count. Section 3-307 covers aggravated nonconsensual sexual contact, sexual contact with a substantially cognitively impaired, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless victim, sexual contact with a victim under 14 where the actor is at least 4 years older, and a sexual act or vaginal intercourse with a victim 14 or 15 where the actor is at least 21. It is a felony carrying imprisonment not exceeding 10 years. Section 3-308 covers sexual contact without consent, and a sexual act or vaginal intercourse with a victim 14 or 15 where the actor is at least 4 years older. It is a misdemeanor punishable by up to 1 year or a $1,000 fine, enhanced to 3 years for a defendant with specified priors.

Section 3-304, rape in the second degree, applies where vaginal intercourse or a sexual act occurs without consent, where the victim is substantially cognitively impaired, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless and the actor knows or should know of that condition, or where the victim is under 14 and the actor is at least 4 years older. The maximum is imprisonment not exceeding 20 years. Section 3-303, rape in the first degree, adds a statutory aggravator such as a dangerous weapon, suffocation, strangulation, disfigurement or serious physical injury, a threat of imminent death or kidnapping, aid by another person, or commission in connection with a burglary. That section carries imprisonment not exceeding life.

Sections 3-305 and 3-306, the former first and second degree sexual offense sections, no longer state current law. Present statutes refer to them only as they existed before October 1, 2017.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle These Cases

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys begin by mapping the allegation onto the statute. A count under § 3-602 rises or falls on care, custody, responsibility for supervision, or household or family status, and that element is factual, provable, and sometimes simply wrong. A count under § 3-307 or § 3-308 turns on the type of contact alleged, the age of the child at the time of each alleged act, and the age difference between the child and the accused. The defense reads each count on its own terms rather than treating the case as one undifferentiated accusation.

The second step examines how the account reached the State. A disclosure in these cases often passes through several adults before anyone records an interview. A parent, a teacher, a counselor, or a relative hears a fragment, asks questions, and repeats a version that later appears in a report. The firm gathers the successive versions, compares them, and documents what changed and when. Forensic interview recordings, medical records, school records, text messages, and device data frequently narrow or contradict the charged timeline.

The third step addresses the interval before charges. Detectives regularly seek a statement, and sometimes a monitored telephone call, before an arrest. The firm intervenes at that stage and communicates with the investigating agency on the client’s behalf.

The fourth step is preparation on the counts that survive. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys litigate suppression questions, test the sufficiency of proof on each element, prepare cross-examination of the State’s witnesses, and evaluate whether a defense review of the forensic record is warranted. Sentencing exposure, custody consequences, and the registration classifications in Md. Code, Crim. Proc. § 11-701 inform that strategy from the outset rather than at the end.

The Attorneys Who Defend These Maryland Charges

Mr. Sris founded the firm in 1997 and holds the title Owner and Founder. He is a former prosecutor, and that background informs how he reads a Maryland file: what the State must document before it charges, where a charging decision rests on assumption rather than proof, and how an investigation takes shape in the weeks before an arrest. He is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York.

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys concentrate in criminal defense and handle allegations involving children in Maryland courts. A case of this kind demands attention to the sequence in which a disclosure moved from person to person, to the age-based elements written into § 3-307 and § 3-308, to the care, custody, or supervision element in § 3-602, and to the registration classifications set out in Md. Code, Crim. Proc. § 11-701. The firm reviews the charging document count by count with the client, so that the person facing the charge understands what the State has alleged and, equally, what it has not alleged.

The firm maintains a 24/7 phone intake, so a family that learns of an arrest or a detective’s visit outside regular hours can begin the conversation without waiting. Request a consultation by calling (888) 437-7747.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is child molestation a separate offense under Maryland law?

No. Maryland’s criminal code does not contain an offense by that name. When people describe a case as child molestation, the State charges the conduct under Md. Code, Crim. Law § 3-602, sexual abuse of a minor, or under a sexual offense section such as § 3-307 or § 3-308, or under § 3-304 or § 3-303 where the allegation involves a sexual act or vaginal intercourse. The section on the charging document controls the elements and the maximum sentence. The first thing to read in your paperwork is therefore the section number, not the description that a police report or a school letter used.

What does Section 3-602 require the State to prove?

Section 3-602 applies to a parent or other person who has permanent or temporary care, custody, or responsibility for supervision of a minor, and to a household or family member. The State must establish that status, and it must establish that the person caused sexual abuse to the minor. The statute defines sexual abuse as an act involving sexual molestation or exploitation, whether or not physical injuries are sustained. The offense is a felony carrying imprisonment not exceeding 25 years. If your relationship to the child does not fit the status the section describes, that gap goes to the count itself and not merely to mitigation.

Can a Maryland case go forward without medical findings?

The elements in these sections do not include physical injury. Section 3-602 states that sexual abuse means an act involving sexual molestation or exploitation whether or not physical injuries are sustained, and the sexual offense sections define prohibited conduct by contact, act, age, and consent rather than by injury. A case can therefore proceed on testimony. The absence of corroboration shapes what the firm investigates: the origin of the account, the adults who handled it before it reached the State, the timeline the account requires, and the records that either fit that timeline or do not.

A detective asked for an interview. What should you consider?

Detectives frequently seek a statement before an arrest, and in cases involving children they sometimes arrange a recorded telephone call from the complaining household. Anything you say becomes part of the file the prosecutor reviews when choosing which section to charge, and a denial that carries an unnecessary detail can narrow your position later. You are not obligated to sit for an interview. The steadier course is to decline politely and let counsel contact the agency, which lets the firm learn what the agency is examining without adding to the record. Call (888) 437-7747 before you respond to an interview request.

Does a conviction lead to registration in Maryland?

Md. Code, Crim. Proc. § 11-701 establishes tier I, tier II, and tier III classifications. Which classification applies depends on the provision of conviction and on the statutory definitions, and the answer can shift if the charge changes during the case. For that reason the firm reviews registration exposure against the actual counts in your charging document rather than against the label people use in conversation. Registration questions also interact with custody and employment questions that often arise at the same moment. Those consequences belong in the analysis from the first meeting, not after a plea has been entered.

This page provides general information and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.