Federal Seizure Warrant: Bank Account Frozen | Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C.

Toll-free intake · Consultations by appointment · Intake available in English and Spanish

Federal Seizure Warrant Bank Account Frozen Lawyer

Most people learn about a federal seizure warrant when a payment is declined. The bank cannot explain much, the balance is visible but unavailable, and no one has been charged with anything. That combination is disorienting and it is also common, because seizure operates independently of any criminal charge.

Two things follow immediately. There is a clock, and it is short and unforgiving. And there is usually a criminal investigation behind the seizure, which means every step taken to recover the money has consequences on that side as well. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. has been practicing since 1997, and Mr. Sris brings a background in accounting and information systems from George Mason University, applied to complex financial and technology-related cases. To discuss a seized account, request a consultation at (888) 437-7747.

What Actually Happened

A seizure warrant is issued by a judicial officer on a showing of probable cause that the funds are subject to forfeiture, usually because they are alleged to be proceeds of specified unlawful activity or property involved in a money laundering offense. The relevant authorities include 18 U.S.C. § 981, which addresses civil forfeiture of such property, and 18 U.S.C. § 984, which permits seizure of fungible property such as funds in an account within defined limits without tracing each dollar.

Section 984 is the reason people are often bewildered. Because money in an account is fungible, the government does not always have to trace the specific dollars alleged to be tainted; it can seize an equivalent amount from the account within the statutory constraints. An account holder who knows the balance came from legitimate business receipts can therefore still find it seized.

The bank is not the decision-maker and generally cannot tell you much. It received a legal process and complied with it. Directing frustration at the bank produces nothing; the question has to be taken up with the government.

You should receive notice of the seizure. That notice matters enormously, because it starts the deadlines and identifies the agency, the case reference, and the route for responding.

Seizure Is Not Forfeiture

Seizure is the taking of custody. Forfeiture is the transfer of ownership to the government, and it requires a separate process. The funds are not yet the government’s, and that distinction is what a response is built on.

Three routes exist. Administrative forfeiture is handled by the seizing agency itself and completes without any court involvement if nobody files a claim. Civil judicial forfeiture is an action in federal court against the property itself. Criminal forfeiture is part of a criminal case against a person and follows a conviction.

The critical point is that administrative forfeiture requires no judge and no hearing. If the deadline passes without a properly filed claim, the government obtains the funds by default, and reopening that is difficult. A large proportion of forfeitures complete this way, not because the claims lacked merit but because nobody responded in time.

The Immediate Problem: Operating Funds

For a business, a frozen operating account is an emergency measured in days. Payroll, rent, suppliers, and tax obligations do not pause. For an individual, a frozen personal account can mean a mortgage payment missed and a family without access to money.

Several avenues exist and they should be pursued in parallel rather than sequentially. Counsel can approach the prosecuting authority directly about releasing funds not genuinely in dispute, particularly where the seizure captured more than the alleged tainted amount or swept in identifiable legitimate receipts. Where the amount seized exceeds what the government can justify, that argument is frequently productive.

Where a criminal forfeiture is anticipated and a defendant needs access to untainted funds to retain counsel, there is a body of law addressing that situation, and a hearing on the question is sometimes available. That is a specific application and it depends on the facts.

Practical steps matter too. Establishing a separate account for ongoing receipts, documenting the source of funds carefully, and communicating with lenders and suppliers before defaults occur all reduce the damage while the legal question is worked out.

Deadlines

The deadlines that follow a seizure notice are short and they are strictly enforced. Missing one can forfeit the claim entirely regardless of how strong the underlying position is, and courts have limited discretion to excuse a late filing.

Because the specific periods depend on the type of forfeiture, the agency involved, and the form of notice given, the notice document itself is the controlling source. It should go to counsel immediately rather than being set aside while a decision is made about whether to fight.

A claim also has formal requirements. It must be filed in the correct form, with the correct agency or court, identifying the property and the claimant’s interest, and executed under penalty of perjury. A defective claim can be treated as no claim at all.

The Criminal Shadow

A seizure warrant almost always means a criminal investigation exists. That changes how a forfeiture response is built, because a claim asserting an interest in the property is a sworn statement about the source and ownership of the money, made by a person who may later be a defendant.

Nothing about that argues for silence, since silence forfeits the money. It argues for the two tracks being handled together by counsel who is looking at both, so that a claim which is accurate and sufficient does not become an admission on the criminal side.

The reverse is also true. A forfeiture proceeding can generate discovery and testimony that reveals the shape of the government’s case earlier than a criminal defendant would otherwise learn it, and that has value.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was my account frozen when I have not been charged?

Forfeiture operates independently of any criminal charge. A seizure warrant issues on a showing of probable cause that the funds are subject to forfeiture, commonly under 18 U.S.C. § 981, and no charge against any person is required. Many seizures occur while an investigation is ongoing, and some are never accompanied by a prosecution at all.

How can they take money that came from my business?

Under 18 U.S.C. § 984, funds in an account are treated as fungible, which within statutory limits allows the government to seize an equivalent amount without tracing specific dollars. That is why a balance built from legitimate receipts can be seized where a portion is alleged to be tainted. Establishing what the account actually contained is a substantive part of the response.

What happens if I do nothing?

You very likely lose the money. Administrative forfeiture completes without a judge and without a hearing where no claim is filed by the deadline, and the government obtains the funds by default. A large share of forfeitures complete this way. Reopening a defaulted forfeiture afterward is difficult and often not possible.

How long do I have to respond?

The periods are short and strictly enforced, and they depend on the type of forfeiture, the agency, and the form of notice given. The notice you receive is the controlling document and should go to counsel immediately. Courts have limited discretion to excuse a late filing, so a strong underlying position does not survive a missed deadline.

Can I get some money released to operate?

Sometimes. Counsel can approach the prosecuting authority about releasing funds not genuinely in dispute, which is often productive where the seizure captured more than the alleged tainted amount or swept in identifiable legitimate receipts. Where access to untainted funds to retain counsel is at issue, a hearing on that question is sometimes available. Outcomes depend on the facts.

Should I explain to the agent where the money came from?

Not directly, and not without counsel. A seizure almost always accompanies a criminal investigation, and an explanation of the source of funds is a statement about your own conduct. An inaccurate statement to a federal agent is a separate offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The explanation still has to be made, but in the correct form and through counsel.

Working With Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C.

A seized account is two problems at once: a filing deadline that forfeits the money if missed, and a criminal investigation in which every explanation of the source of funds is a statement about conduct. Handling them together is what keeps a necessary claim from becoming an admission.

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor and is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. The firm has been practicing since 1997. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys handle criminal defense matters across those jurisdictions, which matters in federal practice because a single investigation frequently reaches conduct, witnesses, and records in more than one state. Mr. Sris brings a background in accounting and information systems from George Mason University, applied to complex financial and technology-related cases.

The firm serves Northern Virginia from 1655 Fort Myer Dr, Suite 700, Room 719, Arlington, VA 22209 and central Virginia from 7400 Beaufont Springs Drive, Suite 300, Room 395, Richmond, VA 23225. By appointment. Call (888) 437-7747 to schedule. Request a consultation. Reach our location at (888) 437-7747.

Related pages

This page provides general information about federal seizure warrants and frozen accounts and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.

All practice pages

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder.

Attorney advertising. This page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes and their application change and vary by case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; results may vary. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney. Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.