Charged Under 50 U.S.C. 1705 What Happens Next | Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C.

Toll-free intake · Consultations by appointment · Intake available in English and Spanish

Charged Under 50 U.S.C. 1705 What Happens Next

A sanctions case rarely begins with an arrest. It begins with a blocked payment, a report filed by a financial institution, an administrative inquiry about a transaction history, or an interview conducted inside a company. By the time a charge issues under 50 U.S.C. § 1705, a substantial record already exists, and much of it was produced by people protecting a business rather than defending a person.

This page sets out what ordinarily happens after that, stage by stage, and what a defendant will be asked to decide at each one. It is general information about procedure and not advice about a particular case. To discuss a sanctions charge, call (888) 437-7747.

Before the Charge

The pre-charge phase is where the most consequential decisions are made and where people are least likely to have counsel. Records demands and subpoenas go to companies and financial institutions. Employees are interviewed, sometimes by agents and sometimes by counsel the company retained. Administrative inquiries about the same transactions run alongside all of it.

Two things are worth settling early. Whether to answer questions at all, which is a decision to make with counsel and not in a corridor. And whether the company and the individual still share an interest, because company counsel acts for the company and the privilege over an internal interview belongs to it. Both become harder to manage once documents have been produced and statements made.

Charge, Initial Appearance, and Release

The charge arrives as an indictment, or as an information where a resolution is already under discussion. The first appearance is brief: the court states the charges, counsel is identified, and release is addressed. Conditions in sanctions cases commonly include travel restrictions, surrender of travel documents, limits on contact with people connected to the transactions, and sometimes restrictions that reach employment in a regulated role.

Arraignment follows and a scheduling order issues, fixing the motions deadline and a trial date. In a case built on a large transaction record, that order is usually the first thing counsel asks the court to revisit, because the volume of production and any parallel administrative proceeding do not fit an ordinary schedule.

Discovery and Motions

Discovery includes transaction records, screening data, compliance files, internal correspondence, device and server images, financial institution reports and agent notes. Counsel organizes it by element rather than by source, because the questions that decide the case are what prohibition applied, whether the conduct fell within it, and what the defendant understood.

Motion practice follows from that. The scope of warrants for devices and images, the handling of privileged and personal material inside them, the circumstances of any interview, the accuracy of translations, and the admissibility of summary charts are the recurring subjects. Where the government relies on a summary exhibit, obtaining the underlying data and the selection method is a priority rather than an afterthought.

Resolution, Trial, and Sentencing

Most federal cases resolve without a trial and sanctions cases are no exception, but the criminal disposition is only part of what is being negotiated. Civil and administrative exposure, export and banking privileges and contracting status frequently matter as much to a client, and a resolution reached without them can be a poor trade.

If the case is tried, it is tried on the prohibition, the conduct and willfulness. Sentencing is driven by the advisory Guidelines calculation and then by the statutory sentencing factors the court weighs, and in these cases the calculation usually turns on how the transactions are valued and what role the defendant is found to have had. What the provision itself carries should be confirmed with counsel against the current statutory text.

Frequently Asked Questions

A payment of mine was blocked. Am I under investigation?

Not necessarily. Blocking and reporting are compliance steps taken by an institution, and most blocked payments never become criminal matters. It is a reason to gather the underlying facts and preserve records, not a reason to contact the institution or the licensing agency with an explanation. If that contact is made at all, it should be made through counsel.

Should I respond to an administrative inquiry myself?

Answering an inquiry is a statement and it can be used later in a criminal case. Companies answer these routinely to protect a license or a business relationship, which is a different objective from protecting an individual. Anyone whose own conduct is described in the answer should have independent counsel before it is filed.

Will I be detained before trial?

Release is the usual outcome in these cases, but conditions are common, including travel restrictions, surrender of travel documents and limits on contact with people connected to the transactions. Where a condition would end a defendant’s employment, counsel should raise it at the release hearing rather than try to modify it afterwards.

How long will the case take?

Longer than the charge suggests. The transaction record is large, the questions about which prohibition applied and what was authorized are litigated before the trial issues narrow, and a parallel administrative or civil matter often runs alongside. Counsel usually asks for a realistic schedule at the outset rather than a series of extensions later.

Can the criminal and administrative matters be resolved together?

Sometimes, and it is worth attempting, because a criminal resolution that leaves the administrative consequences unaddressed can be the worse outcome for a client. Whether it is possible depends on the posture of each track and on whether a company is resolving its own exposure at the same time.

What should I do first?

Preserve everything, including personal devices and accounts that hold work communications, and stop discussing the matter with colleagues who may become witnesses. Then get counsel involved before responding to anyone. Access to records is often lost when employment ends, so preservation is urgent in a way that is easy to underestimate.

Working With Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C.

A sanctions charge moves through a long pre-charge phase, a release hearing that can affect a client’s employment, a document-heavy discovery period and a narrow set of trial questions. Knowing which decisions arrive at which stage is what keeps early choices from foreclosing later ones.

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor and is admitted in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. The firm has been practicing since 1997. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys handle criminal defense matters across those jurisdictions, which matters in federal practice because a single investigation frequently reaches conduct, witnesses, and records in more than one state. Mr. Sris brings a background in accounting and information systems from George Mason University, applied to complex financial and technology-related cases.

The firm serves Northern Virginia from 1655 Fort Myer Dr, Suite 700, Room 719, Arlington, VA 22209 and central Virginia from 7400 Beaufont Springs Drive, Suite 300, Room 395, Richmond, VA 23225. By appointment. Call (888) 437-7747 to schedule. Request a consultation. Reach our location at (888) 437-7747.

Related pages

This page provides general information about the course of a case charged under 50 U.S.C. § 1705 and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.

All practice pages

Reviewed by Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder.

Attorney advertising. This page is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Statutes and their application change and vary by case. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; results may vary. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed attorney. Attorney responsible for this advertising: Mr. Sris.