Sole Custody Lawyer Brooklyn

Parents pursuing sole custody in Kings County sometimes assume New York law gives one parent, often the mother or the parent who has been the primary caregiver, a built-in advantage over the other. That assumption does not reflect how the state’s custody statute actually works. DRL §240(1)(a) directs Brooklyn courts to decide custody and support as, in the court’s discretion, justice requires, with regard to the circumstances of the case, the parties, and above all the best interests of the child, and the statute establishes no prima facie right to custody in either parent. In practice, this means a parent seeking sole custody in Kings County Supreme Court must build a case grounded in evidence relevant to the child’s best interests rather than relying on an assumed presumption in their favor. The same best-interests standard applies whether a parent is requesting sole custody or the case ultimately proceeds toward a joint arrangement, since New York does not have a separate statute governing joint custody outcomes. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. represents parents in Kings County custody matters, working to organize the evidence a court will weigh, including the child’s routine, each parent’s role, and, where relevant, the effect of any proven domestic violence on the child’s well-being. Because a sole custody request lives or dies on the strength of the evidence presented rather than any starting advantage, preparation matters from the outset. To discuss a Brooklyn sole custody matter, call (888) 437-7747 to schedule a consultation.

On this page

What Sole Custody Means in Brooklyn

Sole custody refers to an arrangement in which one parent holds primary decision-making authority, physical custody, or both, rather than sharing those responsibilities jointly with the other parent. In Kings County, as throughout New York, custody determinations are governed by DRL §240(1)(a), which directs the court to enter custody and support orders as, in its discretion, justice requires, having regard to the circumstances of the case and of the respective parties, and always with the best interests of the child as the central consideration. A point that surprises many Brooklyn parents is that the statute establishes no prima facie right to custody in either parent. Neither a mother nor a father begins a custody case with a built-in legal advantage, and a request for sole custody must instead be supported by evidence connected to the child’s best interests, such as each parent’s role in the child’s daily life, stability, and ability to meet the child’s needs.

DRL §240(1)(a) also directs the court to consider the effect on the child of any proven domestic violence between the parents or between a parent and another household member, as part of the best-interests analysis. At the same time, the statute protects a parent who makes a good-faith allegation of abuse or neglect based on a reasonable belief, and who acts lawfully in response to that belief, from being deprived of or restricted in custody or visitation solely because that parent made the allegation.

Joint custody, by contrast, contemplates shared decision-making or shared physical custody between the parents, but New York does not maintain a separate statute for joint custody outcomes. The same DRL §240(1)(a) best-interests standard, and the same absence of any prima facie right to custody in either parent, governs whether a Kings County court ultimately orders sole custody, joint custody, or some combination tailored to the family’s circumstances.

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Sole Custody Cases

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys approach sole custody matters by building a factual record aligned with the best-interests standard in DRL §240(1)(a), rather than assuming any parent starts from an advantage. Because the statute establishes no prima facie right to custody in either parent, the firm works with Brooklyn clients to gather the specific evidence a Kings County Supreme Court will weigh, including each parent’s day-to-day involvement, the child’s routine and schooling, stability of housing, and each parent’s ability to support the child’s needs going forward.

When a case involves allegations of domestic violence, the firm addresses that evidence carefully, recognizing both that DRL §240(1)(a) requires the court to consider proven domestic violence’s effect on the child, and that a parent who raises a good-faith, reasonable allegation of abuse or neglect and responds to it lawfully is protected from being penalized in custody or visitation solely for raising that concern. The firm helps clients present this kind of evidence accurately and in the proper format for the court’s consideration.

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys also help clients understand how a sole custody request compares to a joint custody arrangement, since both are evaluated under the same best-interests framework rather than separate legal standards. The firm practices in custody and family law matters throughout the jurisdictions where its attorneys are admitted, and applies that experience to Brooklyn parents navigating a Kings County custody dispute, whether the case proceeds by agreement or requires litigation before the court.

About the Firm

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., founded the firm in 1997 and is a former prosecutor. His background in accounting and information systems from George Mason University has been applied to complex financial and technology-related cases. Mr. Sris is admitted to practice in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. He works alongside the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys, and this page refers to them collectively, together with Mr. Sris, as Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys, rather than naming individual attorneys. The firm’s family law practice in Kings County includes custody matters, including sole custody requests.

The firm’s principal office is located at 4008 Williamsburg Court, Fairfax, VA 22032, and the firm does not operate a physical location in Brooklyn or elsewhere in Kings County. Clients in Brooklyn are served by appointment, with intake handled by phone. This structure allows Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys to represent parents in Kings County Supreme Court custody matters while maintaining a single principal office. A parent considering a sole custody matter in Brooklyn can call the firm to discuss scheduling an appointment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does either parent have an automatic advantage in a Brooklyn sole custody case?
No. DRL §240(1)(a) establishes no prima facie right to custody in either parent, meaning neither a mother nor a father starts a Kings County custody case with a built-in legal presumption in their favor. A request for sole custody must be supported by evidence relevant to the child’s best interests rather than an assumption that one parent is automatically favored. This applies equally regardless of which parent has historically been the primary caregiver, though the court may still consider that role as one of many facts relevant to the best-interests analysis.

What does “best interests of the child” mean under DRL 240(1)(a)?
DRL §240(1)(a) directs the court to decide custody as, in its discretion, justice requires, with regard to the circumstances of the case and of the parties, always centered on the child’s best interests. The statute does not provide a fixed checklist, so a Kings County court weighs the specific facts of each family, including each parent’s role in the child’s life, stability, and ability to meet the child’s needs. Because this is a discretionary, fact-specific standard, the evidence presented in a particular case has significant influence on the outcome.

How does domestic violence affect a Brooklyn custody decision?
DRL §240(1)(a) requires the court to consider the effect on the child of any proven domestic violence between the parents, or between a parent and a member of the household, as part of the best-interests analysis. This means evidence of proven domestic violence is a factor the court must weigh, not simply background information. How much weight it carries depends on the specific facts presented and how the violence affected the child, which is a case-specific determination rather than an automatic outcome.

Can a parent lose custody or visitation rights for reporting suspected abuse?
DRL §240(1)(a) protects a parent who makes a good-faith allegation of abuse or neglect, based on a reasonable belief, and who acts lawfully in response to that belief, from being deprived of custody or restricted in visitation solely because the parent made the allegation. This protects parents from being penalized simply for raising a good-faith concern about a child’s safety. The protection applies to allegations made in good faith and does not extend to allegations found not to meet that standard.

What is the difference between sole custody and joint custody in New York?
Sole custody generally means one parent holds primary decision-making authority, physical custody, or both. Joint custody generally means the parents share decision-making, physical custody, or both. New York does not have a separate statute governing joint custody outcomes; both sole and joint arrangements are evaluated under the same best-interests standard in DRL §240(1)(a), including the rule that neither parent has a prima facie right to custody. Which arrangement a Kings County court orders depends on the evidence presented about the child’s best interests in that specific case.

This page provides general information and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney Advertising. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., principal office: 4008 Williamsburg Court, Fairfax, VA 22032. By appointment. Call (888) 437-7747 to schedule.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.