Uber Accident Lawyer New York

Being hurt in a rideshare vehicle, or by one, raises a question that does not come up in an ordinary car accident: which insurance policy actually applies. A rideshare driver’s coverage can differ depending on whether the app was off, on and waiting for a ride request, or actively transporting a passenger at the moment of the crash. That distinction can determine which insurer is responsible and how much coverage is available, which makes an Uber accident claim more layered than a typical two-driver collision. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. reviews rideshare accident claims for passengers, drivers, and other motorists injured in New York.

Whether you were a passenger in the Uber vehicle, the Uber driver, or someone in another vehicle struck by a rideshare driver, the claim still has to work through New York’s ordinary motor-vehicle framework, including the no-fault threshold and comparative fault rules, on top of the coverage questions specific to rideshare trips.

If you were injured in an accident involving an Uber or other rideshare vehicle in New York, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys can review the circumstances of the trip and the crash. Call (888) 437-7747 to discuss what happened.

On this page

What an Uber Accident Claim Means in New York

An Uber accident claim is a motor-vehicle injury claim with an added layer of complexity involving the rideshare company’s insurance structure and the driver’s status on the app at the time of the crash. As with any other motor-vehicle collision in New York, the claim proceeds within the state’s no-fault framework under N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102 and § 5104, meaning an injured person generally must show the injury meets one of the statute’s eight “serious injury” categories before recovering damages for pain and suffering from the responsible party.

Comparative fault follows the same motor-vehicle-specific rule as other auto claims. Because an Uber accident claim is a personal injury action arising from a motor-vehicle accident subject to Insurance Law article 51, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(b) applies rather than the general comparative fault rule in § 1411(a): a claimant whose own fault is greater than the fault of the person or persons against whom recovery is sought is barred from recovery entirely. This applies regardless of whether the claimant was a rideshare passenger, the rideshare driver, or an occupant of another vehicle.

A key factual issue in these cases is establishing which insurance coverage applies, since a rideshare driver’s own personal auto policy, contrasted with coverage made available through the rideshare company while the app is active, can produce very different available limits depending on the driver’s status — off the app, waiting for a match, or actively en route to or transporting a passenger — at the time of the collision. An Uber accident personal injury claim is generally subject to the three-year limitations period in N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(5).

How Mr. Sris and the Firm’s Of Counsel Attorneys Handle Uber Accident Cases

Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys begin an Uber accident case by working to establish the driver’s app status at the time of the crash, since that status affects which insurance coverage applies and how much is available. This often requires requesting trip data, driver account records, and information from the rideshare company alongside the standard police report and witness information gathered in any motor-vehicle case.

The firm evaluates the claim against New York’s no-fault serious-injury threshold under N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102 and applies the motor-vehicle-specific comparative fault rule in N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(b) to assess how the claimant’s own conduct, if any, may affect recovery. Where a claimant was a rideshare passenger, the firm considers claims against the rideshare driver, another at-fault driver, or both, along with the applicable insurance layers.

Because rideshare coverage disputes can add time to a claim, the firm works to identify the correct insurer and coverage tier early and keeps the client informed as records are gathered and the claim is negotiated. The intake line is staffed for 24/7 phone intake so a person injured in a rideshare-related crash can begin the review process promptly.

About the Firm

Mr. Sris, Owner and Founder of Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., is a former prosecutor admitted to practice in Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New Jersey, and New York. Since founding the firm in 1997, Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys have handled motor-vehicle injury claims, including cases arising from rideshare and app-based transportation accidents in New York.

The firm’s Of Counsel attorneys contract directly with Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C. Mr. Sris and the firm’s Of Counsel attorneys review each Uber accident matter individually, considering the driver’s app status at the time of the crash, the applicable insurance coverage, and how the no-fault threshold and comparative fault rules apply to the specific facts.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does it matter whether the Uber driver had the app on at the time of the crash?

Yes. A rideshare driver’s insurance coverage can differ depending on whether the app was off, on and waiting for a ride request, or actively transporting a passenger. Establishing the driver’s status at the time of the collision is often a central factual issue in determining which insurance coverage applies and how much is available.

Can I bring a claim if I was a passenger in the Uber?

Yes. A passenger injured in a rideshare vehicle can generally pursue a claim against the rideshare driver, another driver involved in the collision, or both, depending on who was at fault. The claim still has to satisfy New York’s no-fault threshold under N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102 before pain and suffering damages can be recovered.

How does the no-fault threshold apply to a rideshare accident claim?

An Uber accident claim is treated as a motor-vehicle injury claim, so it is subject to the same serious-injury threshold under N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102 and § 5104 that applies to any other car accident. The injured person must show the injury meets one of the statute’s eight categories before recovering damages for pain and suffering.

What if I was partly at fault for the accident?

Because an Uber accident claim is a personal injury action arising from a motor-vehicle accident subject to Insurance Law article 51, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1411(b) applies: a claimant whose own fault is greater than the fault of the person or persons against whom recovery is sought is barred from recovery entirely. This differs from the general proportional-reduction rule that applies to most other personal injury claims in New York.

How long do I have to file an Uber accident claim in New York?

An Uber accident personal injury claim is generally subject to the three-year limitations period in N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(5), running from the date of the accident. The specific facts of the claim, including the parties involved, should be reviewed to confirm no shorter or different deadline applies.

What if I was injured by an Uber driver while I was in my own vehicle?

An occupant of another vehicle struck by a rideshare driver can pursue a claim in the same way as any other motor-vehicle accident victim, subject to New York’s no-fault threshold and comparative fault rules. The rideshare company’s insurance coverage may be available depending on the driver’s app status at the time of the crash, in addition to the driver’s own personal auto policy.

This page provides general information and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case results depend on a variety of factors unique to each case. Results may vary.

Attorney Advertising. Law Offices Of SRIS, P.C., principal office: 4008 Williamsburg Court, Fairfax, VA 22032. By appointment. Call (888) 437-7747 to schedule.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

An Uber accident claim is one part of motor vehicle accidents work, and our page on car accident lawyer New York covers the wider process.